🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.