🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has taken on a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are paid to address white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the observance is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, far-right parties are expanding in the EU as a entirety.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to scrub African American heritage and narrative from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance symbolises how little it can be influential if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is needed. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month completely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an era that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in educational programs. It would also be a era that does not avoid governmental matters, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What use is mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Establishments who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to subtle slights, but faced with the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.